<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WFRP3 &#8211; What&#8217;s the Verdict?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/2010/02/wfrp3-whats-the-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/2010/02/wfrp3-whats-the-verdict/</link>
	<description>Role playing game articles, reviews, humor, links, free downloads and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J P</title>
		<link>http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/2010/02/wfrp3-whats-the-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>J P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/?p=409#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your continued attempts to post here - last WP upgrade trashed a few things.  

I know exactly where you&#039;re coming from with what you&#039;re saying, and I too think as far as *some* fans, WFRP 3E is indeed &quot;Fail&quot;, overall - as I said, some ideas seem admirable, but overall, the whole concept of just gutting everything but the name was just ruthless and uncaring.

I too haven&#039;t played 3E, and unless I happen to find myself at a con, which doesn&#039;t happen, nobody I know has the kind of money to keep up with buying new RPGs anymore, so I doubt I&#039;ll be playing it either, and my views are also based on what I&#039;ve read on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your continued attempts to post here &#8211; last WP upgrade trashed a few things.  </p>
<p>I know exactly where you&#8217;re coming from with what you&#8217;re saying, and I too think as far as *some* fans, WFRP 3E is indeed &#8220;Fail&#8221;, overall &#8211; as I said, some ideas seem admirable, but overall, the whole concept of just gutting everything but the name was just ruthless and uncaring.</p>
<p>I too haven&#8217;t played 3E, and unless I happen to find myself at a con, which doesn&#8217;t happen, nobody I know has the kind of money to keep up with buying new RPGs anymore, so I doubt I&#8217;ll be playing it either, and my views are also based on what I&#8217;ve read on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in8sworld</title>
		<link>http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/2010/02/wfrp3-whats-the-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>in8sworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanysite.com/tabletoprpgfun/?p=409#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>Hey there!  I guess I&#039;d like to qualify my FAIL statement since I was
only just looking into the system and haven&#039;t actually played it as
yet.  Since most of my core group have moved on to WoW or similar a
real play test is unlikely any time soon.  It may have just been a
knee-jerk reaction to how much had changed, but I agree with you that
the cards seem like a good idea to keep pertinent info at the ready.
You&#039;re also right about those being photo-copy-able and I imagine
we&#039;ll see custom cards on the internet soon anyway.  All the other
little cardboard chits and the dice pools idea I don&#039;t like so much.
The FAIL isn&#039;t so much from their perspective (ie: will they sell
any), but from my perspective (ie: will I buy it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there!  I guess I&#8217;d like to qualify my FAIL statement since I was<br />
only just looking into the system and haven&#8217;t actually played it as<br />
yet.  Since most of my core group have moved on to WoW or similar a<br />
real play test is unlikely any time soon.  It may have just been a<br />
knee-jerk reaction to how much had changed, but I agree with you that<br />
the cards seem like a good idea to keep pertinent info at the ready.<br />
You&#8217;re also right about those being photo-copy-able and I imagine<br />
we&#8217;ll see custom cards on the internet soon anyway.  All the other<br />
little cardboard chits and the dice pools idea I don&#8217;t like so much.<br />
The FAIL isn&#8217;t so much from their perspective (ie: will they sell<br />
any), but from my perspective (ie: will I buy it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

